Saturday, 31 December 2016

Living in Ukraine: 2016 year-end results, pro-Ukrainian coalition and internal friction, 2017 prospects

2016 was another difficult year for Ukraine. Every month there was an escalation in the front line in eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk; the economy continued its downturn despite governmental optimism; Poroshenko’s party managed to control its satellites; more notorious and incompetent figures were appointed to public posts.

Minsk became one of the keywords in the modern politics of Ukraine. Although Minsk Agreement are rather vague and undetailed, their implementation is presented as the only choice for Ukraine if Kyiv Government wants to enjoy support of the international coalition.
In Ukraine, Canada and Australia are regarded as 100% as allies; the United States and the UK are considered to be more of allies than France or Germany; as the Netherlands fail to support EU-Ukraine Free-Trade Agreement in referendum, there are even calls to boycott goods and companies from this country. There is a separate ring of support made of countries of Eastern Europe that are close to Russian borders, e.g. Poland and Lithuania. Once they were occupied by Russia themselves and feeling the same danger today, they advocate eagerly Ukraine’s sovereignty.
On the eastern front there are soldiers from Belarus, Georgia and Chechnya – they believe that Russia’s defeat in Ukraine may trigger fall of its influence in their countries that lost their either their sovereignty or territory to Kremlin. Besides, Ukrainians are told to have fought in the Caucasus in the 1990s.
Yesterday’s heroes are easily discredited: Nadiya Savchenko has lost any chance to become an important politician due to her collaboration with pro-Russian figures and questionable statements.
Sociological surveys indicate that Poroshenko has no mass support, his party’s rating is below 10%. But there are no prominent politicians able to oppose him. He proved to be an efficient businessman; he continues to be one, possessing a business in Russia (though his assets in the occupied Crimea were reported to have been confiscated).
The actions of Hroisman’s Government prove that he is preparing for the possible early elections of the parliament. Undertakings to improve life of the common people, like doubling the minimum wage, appear to be nothing but blatant populism that destroys economy, and, in particular, its basis – the self-employed middle class.
As Putin is believed to expect better relations with Trump, the Russian offensive might be expected in February 2017. On the other hand, Obama has proved that he has nothing to lose, and his position is firm, so the US will exert pressure on Russia to prevent aggression expansion.