Saturday, 13 July 2019

Presidency of Volodymyr Zelenskyy: Is His Party Under External Control?


We intentionally abstained from covering the results of the Presidential election right after the winner was announced. As Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s team was believed to be anti-establishment, we wanted to dig into the relations inside the team a bit deeper than the general knowledge.



Fact 1. Chat of Zelenskyy’s top circle was published just before the election. We learnt from it that their basic intentions were to make Ukraine a better place.


Fact 2. Outside rather small inner circle, Zelenskyy appeared to lack any real team. Instead, he hired some HR people to interview whoever comes. Unfortunately, this resulted in numerous corrupt officials of the past retaining their high posts.

Fact 3. Despite the declared desire for change, Zelenskyy’s team is at least partially under control of its shareholders. There is unlimited evidence of oligarch Ihor Kolomoyskyi’s strong engagement, as his men are working to secure his interests.

Fact 4. Although approved by the HR, some runners for parliament seats lost their nominations because their positions were not in line with Zelenskyy’s “Servant of the People” party shareholders.

Fact 5. Many people were selected to become members of Zelenskyy’s party as successful young men who did not engage in corruption. However, some of them did not associate themselves with the common sense or any real-life activity; others came from families with strong corruption ties. Neither of them will ever become a true professional – only a cozy puppet for party leaders.

All in all, despite proper motivation, Zelenskyy’s team currently is failing to lead the state by clearly mismanaging all kinds of governmental policies. Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin has actually stated that since Zelenskyy’s election, Ukraine had no foreign policy, meaning that the President did not deal with foreign issues at all. Starting from that day, Zelenskyy began to pay more attention to the foreign policy – though in the form of void declarations, not for-Ukraine actions.